Girish, Chirag: I asked for references and tknhas for providing the same. I hate any Muslim who would go about killing innocents and those Pakistanis that targeted Hindus in Bangladesh deserve hate. I am sure you would not disagree that there were mass murders of Muslims and Hindus at the time of partition on both sides. Cities like Amritsar and Gurudaspur had 50% population and now there are hardly any Muslims in Punjab and Haryana. I have older relatives who can tell you the stories of horrors of partition. Yet, whenever a Muslim hears it, his reaction is  its bygone'. Do you ever hear any Indian Muslims organization doing propaganda on the basis of butchery during partition? There were mass killings of Muslims during Crusades and in Spain, do you hear Palestinian groups or Iraqi groups fighting in the name to avenge the deaths of those died during Crusades? If they fight, they fight against what is going on at present. While if you talk to any sangh supporter, they will hardly leave an opportunity not to speak about the killings of Hindus during Islamic rule or in Pakistan and Bangladesh. It should be a logical, when in any court in the world you cannot punish me for the crimes of my brother, why should Indian Muslims face hatred and death because of what Pakistanis did. Your argue about the freedom of religion in the Muslim countries, which is often an issue raised by human right organization. I argued for the safety and security of non-Muslim cities in the Middle-East which is is ensured by the governments. Even when Palestinians and Iraqis fight among themselves everday, I can hardly recall anybody attacking their Christian neighbors in the lawlessness to avenge Bush or Israel. We know that Hizbullah is an armed group and they have their issues with the Lebanese government. This group fought against Israel and their govenment did not fire a bullet in their support. When they won the war, they did not go on ambushing the army. They staged non-violent protests in Beirut and continue to do so. Imagine if such a proven armed strength was with a hindutva group and they had faced betrayel during a war. There is not a single example parallel to Gujrat where the majority was killing the minority and the state government head was teaching Newton law that every action has a reaction. There is no doubt that commoners in any part of the world whether belonging to any religion can do worst crimes in religious frenzy, what makes the difference is the role of the government to control the same. Many Muslims used to argue in the late 90s that when BJP will be in power there will be no rioting against Muslims because all they are doing is for power and when in power they will establish themselves as better alternative to Congress. Had there been any other government besides BJP in the center, Gujrat would have stopped much earlier. Even during those times there were attempts to stir communal frenzy in Rajasthan and UP but the state governments came with hard hand. We can see it presently that if the UP government wants to control tensions in Agra and Allahbad, it would by all means, and if they let loose it could end up anywhere.