Common Cause and Lokniti Programme of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), launched India’s first Status of Policing in India Report (SPIR 2018) at the India Habitat Centre on May 9.Read More+
India has a Lokpal, finally!
The appointment of Justice (Retd) Pinaki Chandra Ghose as India’s first Lokpal is a direct result of a Common Cause writ petition in the Supreme Court, followed by a contempt of court case and an intervention application filed by our counsel Mr Prashant Bhushan between 2014 and 2017. While we welcome the appointment, we feel the process could have been more inclusive, impartial and transparent.
Although many big leaders and thousands of people have played a role in India’s anti-corruption movement and raising the demand for a Lokpal, the appointment finally came through the judicial route, in a Common Cause intervention application (IA) preceded by a contempt of court case in 2017 and an original petition in 2014.
In the IA filed by Common Cause on January 11, 2019, our counsel Mr Bhushan placed on record that the Search Committee which was formed on the Court’s directions had not held any meeting before December 13, 2018. In response to our petition, the Attorney General informed the Court on March 7, 2019, that the deliberations of the Search Committee were complete. Subsequently, three panels of names for the appointment of the Chairperson, Judicial Member(s) and Non-Judicial Member(s) were forwarded to the Bench. After this, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led selection committee finalised the names, which were then approved by President Ram Nath Kovind.
We understand that the struggle to establish an independent authority to probe corruption complaints against top functionaries and public servants is ongoing for more than 50 years. And that is why, we don’t want to undermine the value of this crucial appointment. Having said that, Common Cause also wants to point out that it would have been a gracious move by the present government to include the leader of the single largest Opposition party in Lok Sabha in the Selection Committee. In addition, one cannot overlook the fact that Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge had rejected the invitation extended to him by the government to attend the Lokpal selection panel meeting on the plea that there is no provision under Section 4 of the Lokpal Act, 2013, for a special invitee to be a part of the Selection Committee.
Common Cause also wants to underscore that the selection process could have done with greater transparency by making public the names proposed by the Search Committee, as well as the grounds on which the panels of names have been chosen.
Common Cause has been fighting for the establishment of an independent and effective Lokpal since 1995, when we filed our first petition relating to the enactment of the Lokpal Act. The organisation has been involved in a long-drawn battle in its bid to curb corruption and bring about transparency in the selection process of high profile institutional appointments.
Post the enactment of the Lokpal Bill on January 1, 2014, we protested the arbitrary nature of the Search Committee Rules by filing a PIL in the Supreme Court on March 5, 2014.
Common Cause has consistently soldiered on, fighting numerous legal battles to appoint an anti-corruption watchdog. Our call to eradicate graft and set up the office of the Lokpal wasn’t answered for the longest time, for which the reason cited by the government was the absence of a Leader of Opposition in the current Lok Sabha. Common Cause challenged this contention through a Supreme Court PIL. The Common Cause petition for the appointment of Lokpal was disposed in April 2017 with the Court maintaining that the Lokpal Act was a perfectly workable piece of legislation. When the government failed to appoint the Lokpal nine months after the Apex Court verdict, we went ahead to file a contempt petition seeking directions against the government’s wilful and deliberate failure to fully comply with the judgment.